On 07/07/2015 04:03 PM, T.Weyergraf wrote: > > Hi all > > On 07/07/2015 10:30 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/07/2015 12:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > [.... loads of stuff deleted .... ] >>> OH .. I see, I did not get the firmware files, but their git pointer >>> info :) >>> >>> I will rebuild and repost. >>> >> Please try the packages that are now in the same location. >> >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/xen-kernel/x86_64/Packages/ > Yes, I can confirm the first packages were broken. I'll try those > tomorrow, when I am back at work. However, they look fine. First of all, > all required files are present and I extracted and md5sum-ed them > against the ones from my kernel ( of which I know they work ). All > md5sums are fine. > > Thanks a lot for the quick fix. > > Are you going to push these packages to the Xen4CentOS repo? The reason > I ask, is that I use Xen4CentOS at work, where I run a fairly large > infrastructure on Xen4CentOS in a production environment. Mixing bug > fixes with minor updates - repo version is at 3.18.12 while you provide > 3.18.17 - is a bit of a problem, as I need to validate the new kernel > version before pushing it into production (read: run some tests, check > if everything works). > I recon that updated versions of LTS kernels incorporate bugfixes, which > are desirable anyway. But i'd rather wait until they are pushed to > Xen4CentOS before "arguing them into production". Hence my question on > the timeline. > I'll give the packages a spin anyway tomorrow and come back to report my > results. > > Again, thanks a lot. And, by the way, rest assured that the whole > Xen4CentOS effort is very much appreciated and matters a lot. Either this Kernel, or one built from the same SRPM and a newer kernel version, will get rolled in soon.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
