Re: SIG repo layout and conflicts between projects within a SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 19/01/2015 18:19, Edward L Heron ha scritto:
> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 12:08 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> The current setup is that every sig has exactly one production repo
>> per CentOS version.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> So it seems we have a couple of ways to approach it.
>>
>> 1. Keep it one repo per SIG, and make all projects in a SIG sort out
>> shared dependencies.
>>
>> 2. Allow one repo per *project* within a SIG (e.g., virt6-xen, virt7-docker)
>>
>> 3. Have some alternate way of doing a "patch", instead of repos.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> On the whole I'm inclined to prefer #2.
>>
>> ...
> 
>   I vote for #2, as well.
> 

I vote #2 as well. It would ease the maintenance of the repo.




>   Though I'm not actively participating in pushing new releases, I'm
> interested because I've got 18 servers currently running CentOS 5 with
> Xen.  I'm concerned about stability of future Xen support in CentOS if
> there are too many chefs touching the packages with the complexity of
> juggling all the virtualization flavors.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> 


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS Users]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux