Dear Colleagues:
Thanks a lot, for your replies, my boss is a big fan of lxc, but I have read many forums, and what I perceive is rhel7 -> docker, centos7 ---> openvz
With great difficulty, I managed a container with virt-manager, I even noticed a bug when trying to create a bridge.
Conclusion, as we want to use a container operating system is better to use openvz, now is there interfaces that allow a user no expert reserve resources such as memory, cpu, etc without going to browse cgroups?
Thanks in advance
-Pablo
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Sven Kieske <S.Kieske@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Scott,
while much of what you say is true
you somehow could lead unaware users
to the conclusion that docker and lxc
are two very different container technologies.
In fact, docker uses lxc for containers.
So it's more a management abstraction layer
with an API.
Nevertheless for true and secure containerization
you'll need openvz atm, sadly it's not in the kernel yet.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
