On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 01:04:21PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 23/05/14 18:58, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:59:14AM -1000, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: > >> +3 XEN! > >> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:56 AM, O'Reilly, Dan <Daniel.OReilly@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> +2 > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: centos-virt-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-virt-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Antony Messerli > >>> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 7:49 AM > >>> To: <centos-virt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Subject: Re: Xen DomU supoprt in RHEL 7 and the CentOS Plan > >>> > >>> +1 on Xen support, I haven't had time to test on RHEL yet or poke around in the kernel yet, but has all of the Xen support been removed from the kernel? > > > > It has not been removed, but .. let me go in details. > > > > You can boot an RHEL7 guest as PV, but there are issues: > > > > 1). The FB driver has been unset (CONFIG_XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND) that means you can > > still do a text-console (in theory). > > Is this an interesting use case? XenServer, for example, doesn't > present a PV frame buffer to any PV guest and I don't recall anyone ever > asking for it. There are better technologies for graphical remote > access (e.g., remote X over SSH, RDP, VNC...). Yes it is. Folks often use 'vncviewer'. > > > 3). There are also some systemd and udev things missing. > > Really? What? There shouldn't be anything extra for a pure PV guest vs > a PVHVM guest (which RedHat do support).] I don't know the details, John Haxby (CCed here) knows them. > > David > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
