I'll do a more thorough response later, but two thoughts real quick (see below) On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looking at the ubuntu package search (http://packages.ubuntu.com/) for > LTS (the latest I see currently being 12.04LTS), they seem to be using a > 0.9.8 customized version of libvirt there. So, they do not seem to use > the latest and greatest libvirt in their enterprise releases either. I > am not a ubuntu numbering expert though, so I might be wrong :) 12.04 LTS came out two years ago now. :-) The 14.04 beta (which I believe will also be an LTS) has the latest libvirt (I think 1.2.2), and may manage to pull in 1.2.3 before it actually ships. I don't think there's any point in having a libvirt driver without libxl support. > Does this explain more of what I think we need to work out? Yes I think so, thanks! -George _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
