Peter wrote:
On 12/22/2013 08:32 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Peter <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:gcc is considered to be part of the standard build toolset and as such is not required to be listed as a dependency in any spec file.Part of a standard build toolset or not, it needs to be mentioned. The dev86 SRPM was pretty old, admittedly. But Fedora, and EPEL, and RHEL, all build their RPM's with "mock" and "koji" these days, and gcc is *not* part of the basic build environment. There are reasons, having to do with cross-compilation and alternative compiler toolchains. So RHEL, Fedora, and EPEL RPM's all specify "cc" or "gcc" as needed,Do take a good look at those Fedora SRPM's if you think I'm kidding..I did check before I made the comment in the first place (this is for el6 from epel buildsys-build is the standard install for mock epel-6):$ yum groupinfo buildsys-build ...Group: Buildsystem building group Mandatory Packages:...gcc gcc-c++...
Additionally, the Fedora Packaging Guidlines list these as exceptions which are not to be added as BuildRequires:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The United States is a nation of laws, badly written and randomly enforced. -- Frank Zappa
Attachment:
pgpPM9Dtw1EE3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
