On 22/11/13 17:11, aurfalien wrote: > Sorry guys, I've tried and tried, no dice. > > Seems like I am missing missing a vent1, vnet2, etc... to br0 association. > > I can see were the vnet# gets created upon VM startup. > > And based on how my VM xml file is set, will go to either br0, br1. br2, etc... > > But in my case, the only interface that works is vnet0 for all my VMs. > > In the CentOS virtual machine manager for whatever NIC you choose, there is a drop down option for virtual network interface. > > For source device, I only ever see a vnet0 to br0. For my other bridges, there is only eth# to vnet#. > > The configs for this are rather simple and I don't know were else to look; > > various /etc/sysconfig/network* files > > and the VM xml config. > > Everythings is set to the same MTU wether standard or jumbo, but no matter what, my VMs network interfaces work when set to vnet0 as its connected to br0. > > I cannot get br6 to show with vnet2 for example. Not even my vnet1 is connected to br1 but rather br0. > > However in the UI as mentioned before, i do not see a vnet1 to br1 relationship. > > Are there any other config files I can look at? > > - aurf Why do you have so many bridges? In almost all cases, only one bridge is needed. The bridge should connect to a real interface to get to the outside world. Then all VMs should point to that bridge. I think you might be over-complicating things. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt