Is the one that is slow the one that has 2g resident?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Sun, 19 May 2013, compdoc wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 22:15:55 -0600
> From: compdoc <compdoc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: 'Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS' <centos-virt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: VM Slowness
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Robert Dinse [mailto:nanook@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 10:04 PM
> >To: compdoc@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS
> >Subject: Re: VM Slowness
>
> >How about a top on the host? Could the virtual machine be getting swapped
> >out on the host?
>
>
> Good question. There is another VM on the host without this issue, but
> here's top from the host:
>
>
> top - 22:11:52 up 1 day, 6:00, 1 user, load average: 0.67, 0.34, 0.29
> Tasks: 175 total, 3 running, 172 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu(s): 4.3%us, 0.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 94.5%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
> 0.0%st
> Mem: 8001476k total, 7794800k used, 206676k free, 284212k buffers
> Swap: 10620924k total, 156k used, 10620768k free, 4390824k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
> 2983 libvirt- 20 0 4373m 2.0g 7392 R 33 26.1 626:39.45 kvm
>
> 3385 libvirt- 20 0 3405m 574m 6868 S 15 7.4 263:01.62 kvm
>
> 36 root 25 5 0 0 0 S 1 0.0 19:24.48 ksmd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
