On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote: > I must say that the meaning of your message is not clear for me. What is > the difference for you between "The sources that will become CentOS 6", > and "CentOS proper" ? What do you have in mind ? Why "KVM may be excluded" ? for reasons out of scope here, CentOS 6 has not formally issued. Thus I must speak of the 'sources that will become' CentOS 6, as there is no binary CentOS 6 yet That said, I have been running private rebuilds of '[t]he sources that will become CentOS 6' at a virtual and colo hosting facility for which I admin, http://www.pmman.com/ As part of that work (related to KVM hardware minimum requirements, compatability with certain local libvirt based tools, and performance of KVM vs. xen), I and other techs have set up and run 'xen.org virtualization' to power the backend dom0's As such, we have working installations that demonstrate that a person may CHOOSE to fork from CentOS's prospective KVM virtualization providing mechanism (that is, may choose to NOT use KVM), and rather one might instead use xen.org based tools Yes ... I agree, English can be a unruly language to parse certain conditional constructs -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
