Re: IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/10/2010 07:12 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> You don't have to restart the guest to add or remove aliases:
>>      
> yes I am aware of that, and that's why I'm wondering whether it is
> better to use aliases rather than to add virtual interfaces (which
> does require to restart guests with our KVM version, no hot-plug I
> think).
>
>    

You said it backwards originally. You said that aliases required 
restarts. ;)

> But is there any drawback with using aliases?
> Or does using virtual interfaces provide additional performance/stability/... ?
>    

I've never had issues with aliases. They 'just work'. I use hundreds of 
them.

-- 
Benjamin Franz
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS Users]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux