Re: Libvirt NAT-based network 2x-4x faster than Libvirt routed network?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/27/2010 12:21 PM, Aleksei Miheev wrote:
>> Is it typo?
>> There can be no subnet with /32 bit mask, it's single host only.
>>
>
> Actually, it is possible:
>
> ip addr add xxx.yyy.zzz.215/32 dev eth0
> ip route add xxx.yyy.zzz.193 dev eth0
> ip route add default via xxx.yyy.zzz.193

Of course you can do that, but it wouldn't a *subnet*. Net like network, 
system consisting of several units.
I rest my case.

--
Veiko
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS Users]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux