I think iSCSI is easier to implement and is certainly fast, but I'm unclear about the number of iSCSI clients that can access a volume (iSCSI target) at the same time. So, I use it with only one client at a time. -----Original Message----- From: centos-virt-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-virt-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steven Ellis Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:55 PM To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: Choices for shared network storage, NFS vs iSCSI Has anyone here ran performance comparisons between NFS and iSCSI when using network storage for KVM based guests. Also which have people found to be easier for managing live migrates etc. Steve -- Steven Ellis - Bulletin.Net Inc - http://www.bulletin.net _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
