On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Christopher G. Stach II <cgs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
----- "Adam Adamou" <adam0x54@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Except NFS doesn't follow normal filesystem semantics and you can end up with corrupt data without knowing it, and it, along with CIFS, will give you a free shitload of network overhead to go along with your possibly corrupt data. OCFS2 or GFS are the only practical choices if you want it to behave like a typical filesystem and not have to worry about catering to it or rewriting software and/or reeducating developers, and OCFS2 is extremely easy to set up.
> either nfs or ocfs2. nfs is the easiest route. ocfs2 will give you a
> clustered filesystem.
The original question didn't specify much about the requirements, though. A single shared filesystem? Read-write or read-only? No filesystem at all? Without that information, I would at first recommend not sharing. It can be a lot of trouble, it's usually not required, and it severely complicates life when things fail.
Well, there is always XenFS... :/
--
Christopher G. Stach II
http://ldsys.net/~cgs/
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt