Re: Xen runlevels 5.3 vs. 5.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In the end, the important question is "Do you run at Runlevel 2?"
> Runlevel 2 and 4 are rarely used and each has different site
> definitions of what its being used for. Some sites use runlevel2 as
> multi-user/no-network, and other sites use it for multi-user/debugging
> (eg runlevel 3 but some changes to see what might have broken when we
> turned on X). Runlevel 4 is similarly used (eg its up to a site to
> define how they want to use it). I think Red Hat normally defines
> their runlevel 2 as multi-user/no-network which would mean xendomains
> should be off... however its probably

a reset of a wireless modem and all things work better. that sentance
should be: "however its up to you in the end."

sorry about that.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS Users]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux