On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:45:56PM +0100, Hildebrand, Nils, 232 wrote: > Hi, > > my local RH-salesman told me that rh6 will be based on a mix of Fedora 11/12 - so I hope for the best. > Yeah, RHEL6 will be based on Fedora 12 (afaik). Also, I think RHEL6 will support running as Xen guest (PV domU), but I don't think they're going to ship dom0 with it.. I really hope they would, but I'm not holding my breath considering how much they talk about KVM.. > At the moment I am stuck with SLES (currently 10) on our Dom0-servers, since it has the newer XEN-version. > I would love to move to RH or CentOS with my Dom0s... > Upgrade to SLES11 at least then.. I think it has Xen 3.4.1 available and 2.6.27 dom0 kernel. -- Pasi > > Kind regards > > Nils > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-virt-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:centos-virt-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pasi Kärkkäinen > > Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 3:58 PM > > To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS > > Subject: Re: High CPU usage when running > > aCentOSguestinVirtualBox > > > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:47:08PM +0100, Hildebrand, Nils, 232 wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > this weekend I took a closer look at KVM. I think that the > > paravirtualized XEN or Hyper-V-Approach is superior to the > > full virtualization. > > > > PV has it's advantages.. > > > > > Red Hat 6 will have XEN-Support (propably XEN 3.4 with > > power-consumption savings). > > > > > > > What did you hear this? Is it a fact? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-virt mailing list > > CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
