Re: Tiny OT: yum priorities or protectbase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personally, I would go with priorities because it gives you more control. 

I'm currently in the process of switching to priorities because of packages from external repos replacing the stable ones that come with CentOS even though I was using protectbase.  I'm not entirely sure this is what was causing my reboot issues on the Xen boxes that I run but it certainly could have been a factor.

Matt

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccarrms@xxxxxxxxx
mccarrms@xxxxxxxxxxxx


On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ben Montanelli <montanelli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm elevating myself from "noob" to "noob with scars." I'm not one to
ask a lot of questions if I have time to find out on my own.

I now know at least a half dozen ways to hose a solid CentOS Xen
install. That's a good thing, I learn from mistakes. Like forgetting to
actually completely configure priority statements in the repo confs.

In the past I have used yum protect-base, but about a year ago or so I
switched to yum priorities because it seems a bit more granular.

Is there a recommended preference on CentOS Xen installs? I'm pretty
conservative now and won't go near Plus or Contribs, I do have Convirt
repos in and it looks like they pulldown a couple dependencies from
RPMForge (paramiko and socat).

I don't plan on anymore repos, but am wary enough to want to nail my
last install down.

Any prefs here for CentOS Xen? Yum Protect-base or Priorities?


_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS Users]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux