----- "Francisco Pérez" <fperez.x@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks all of you. Just with the nonsparse option works all right.> > Then an LVM+nonsparse+phy will be the better setup?> > Regards. Yes, except sparseness is only relevant to file-backed vbds in normal use. (There could ostensibly be a similar lazy block allocation option for a target on something like a SAN/NAS and you would expect some performance degradation for some writes.) -- Christopher G. Stach II _______________________________________________CentOS-virt mailing listCentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
