I didn't read this thread untill here, but mr Levente Farkas, I just wanna thank you by your LFarkas Repo! Last year (at october untill december) I use it to do my experiments with KVM (to my Conclusion's Course Job) and it helps me a lot. :)
2009/4/24 Farkas Levente <lfarkas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Rainer Traut wrote:no it was my patch since original centos kvm modules use e1000 by
> Am 24.04.2009 00:28, schrieb Farkas Levente:
>> as i wrote to you this kmod rpm (as all other centos kmods) use
>> weak-updates so the kernel version is not included in the version by
>> desing. it's working with _all_ centos 5.x kernel.
>>
>> anyway i'll provide these rpms until centos-5.4 released and lets see
>> what will be in 5.4 and then...
>> anyway my current suggestion to use kvm-84.
>> as i be able to put together a consistent build far in my end i'll try
>> to provide i386 rpms too, but as i only use 64bit hosts i only compile it.
>
> Thx for doing this. My F10 guest now has an uptime of 7 days and I
> cannot see any problem neither in dmesg nor in other logfiles.
>
> Ah one thing I forgot, I had to change the emulation of network card to
> e1000 after installing F10 updates. But this may well have been a
> NetworkManager problem - I disabled NM afterwards.
defualt i patch all version to use it. but i thinking about to go back
to kvm's default rtl8169 in the next stable version (probably 86).
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
--
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
