On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Jeff <jlar310@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Jeff <jlar310@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Our experience with HZ=100 in 4.6 kernels was nearly perfect time >> sync, at least to within a second over one week. Not so with >> divider=10. I will grab the -78 SRPM and give it a spin. > > That is very interesting. This is the first time I've heard about the > difference between the two with regard to timekeeping problems. > Please keep us informed of your testing. Just wanted to let you (and anyone who is interested) know that Tru has kindly offered kernel-vm for -78 and -78.0.1 in his usual place: http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/4/ Akemi
