Forgot to mention it, but yes, I edited /etc/modprobe.conf. BTW, I can make the bridge working alone, and the bonding alone also ; but not together. On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 09:25 -0400, Roy Firestein wrote: > Did you also edit the modprobe.conf file? > Here is a good guide: > http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces > > Good luck, > Roy Firestein > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mickaël Canévet" <canevet@xxxxxxx> > To: centos-virt@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:47:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: [CentOS-virt] bonding over bridge or bridge over bonding ? > > Hi, > > I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any > success. Here is my configuration: > > ifcfg-eth0: > > DEVICE=eth0 > HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5 > ONBOOT=yes > USERCTL=no > MASTER=bond0 > SLAVE=yes > > ifcfg-eth1: > > DEVICE=eth1 > HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7 > ONBOOT=yes > USERCTL=no > MASTER=bond0 > SLAVE=yes > > ifcfg-bond0: > > DEVICE=bond0 > ONBOOT=yes > BRIDGE=br0 > USERCTL=no > > ifcfg-bridge0: > > DEVICE=br0 > TYPE=Bridge > BOOTPROTO=static > IPADDR=192.168.52.55 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK=192.168.52.0 > BROADCAST=192.168.52.255 > ONBOOT=yes > DELAY=0 > > eth0 and eth1 don't goes up... > > Am I doing something wrong ? Shouldn't I trying to do a bonding over 2 bridges ? > > Do anybody already tried such a configuration with success ? > > > Thanks > -- _______________________________________________________________________ Mickaël Canévet. European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Grenoble Outstation. FRANCE _______________________________________________________________________
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
