On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:42 AM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25/08/2022 17:10, Trevor Hemsley via CentOS-devel wrote: > > On 25/08/2022 15:28, Robby Callicotte via CentOS-devel wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 25, 2022 8:46:18 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote: > >>> I second this. Our quick docs could use MkDocs like the SIG stuff > >>> does, and the RHELish stuff can use the Antora system the RHEL docs > >>> folks want to use. > >> I agree with Neal here. This seems to offer a good balance. At this > >> point I > >> would argue that the MR/PR nature of git is ubiquitous and is part of > >> everyone's workflow. > > > > So far I've seen lots of "yes, use this" type comments so I'd like to > > ask how this compares in user friendliness to the current wiki (assuming > > that you can get to it because the spammers are taking a rest). I've > > never used any of the alternatives that have been proposed so far. Are > > they wikis? Are they usable for a non-technical user? The wiki, you > > press a button and you can edit content directly and see what it will > > look like before you save it. You can link to other pages easily, you > > can format content how you want it easily, often just at the press of a > > button. > > > > None of what I've heard so far sounds even remotely as usable as what we > > have now. > > > > Trevor > > It seems I opened a "Pandora's box" last week before the weekend ... :-) > > To keep a long story short, I just wanted to announce that something > needs to be done, and also explaining publicly why wiki is misbehaving > on regular basis (so that people don't have wrong expectations about > wiki online service) > > what I see so far for wiki.centos.org : > - nothing is done and so it will just be deleted when centos 7 goes EOL > in June 2024 (no, we'll not even consider having a c7 online past that > EOL date) > - centos-docs team is having a look at migrating content to another wiki > (the sooner the better then), like mediawiki or else > - or just consider moving to "static" sites (decision is up to people > contributing content) > > FWIW, actually it's possible to edit/contribute to SIG guide *without* > having to learn the git workflow (like PR/MR, fork, commit, push, > rebase, etc). > > There is an "Edit this page" button/link on each page under > https://sigs.centos.org/guide/ and it's just log you directly on > git.centos.org (with SSO) to edit directly the page (if you have commit > rights). It works also with github/gitlab > > PS : we don't have to migrate it next week (even if I'd like to see > current setup moved/migrated to something else soon) but just keeping in > mind some EOL dates approaching and not waiting for last minute > discussion ;-) > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org > gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab Let's keep the centos-docs in the loop. Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
