Sorry, folks, i know I have made zero progress on this. The last two
months have been unexpectedly busy. I hope to get back to this soon,
unless someone wants to pick up the charge.
On 6/30/20 2:20 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Hi, folks,
I've been working through the CentOS wiki for more than a year now,
trying to identify and fix outdated/wrong/obsolete content. It's a
daunting task, and I'm losing.
I would very much like to gather a group of people who are:
* Knowledgeable about CentOS
* Good with words
* Have a little time
who would be willing and able to review the content of the wiki, and fix
the bits that are incorrect.
The CentOS Documentation SIG (which doesn't actually exist in any
meaningful way) is, according to the wiki:
responsible for the content of the Wiki, and other public sources of
documentation. This includes, but is not limited to:
* Determining, and imposing, a hierarchy/architecture of content in the
wiki
* Editing/pruning existing content when it is incorrect/outdated/obsolete
* Recruiting subject matter experts to do some of that editing
* Recruiting translators to keep our various translations in sync
[Ref: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation ]
If any of the above appeals to you, I would ask you to let me know. I
would like to create a SIG around the wiki. Please let me know if you're
interested. I know that there are a number of you who are consistently
active on this list. I would like to find a way to give us a little more
power/authority over the wiki to make higher-level editorial decisions
about information architecture. Also, having a formal SIG might be a way
to engage more people to join the effort and dedicate some time to it.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
