Hi, I only spotted this now. I'm definitely interested and we
should keep docs.centos.org looped in as part of the SIG.
Petr
On 6/30/20 8:20 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Hi, folks,
I've been working through the CentOS wiki for more than a year now, trying to identify and fix outdated/wrong/obsolete content. It's a daunting task, and I'm losing.
I would very much like to gather a group of people who are:
* Knowledgeable about CentOS
* Good with words
* Have a little time
who would be willing and able to review the content of the wiki, and fix the bits that are incorrect.
The CentOS Documentation SIG (which doesn't actually exist in any meaningful way) is, according to the wiki:
responsible for the content of the Wiki, and other public sources of documentation. This includes, but is not limited to:
* Determining, and imposing, a hierarchy/architecture of content in the wiki
* Editing/pruning existing content when it is incorrect/outdated/obsolete
* Recruiting subject matter experts to do some of that editing
* Recruiting translators to keep our various translations in sync
[Ref: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation ]
If any of the above appeals to you, I would ask you to let me know. I would like to create a SIG around the wiki. Please let me know if you're interested. I know that there are a number of you who are consistently active on this list. I would like to find a way to give us a little more power/authority over the wiki to make higher-level editorial decisions about information architecture. Also, having a formal SIG might be a way to engage more people to join the effort and dedicate some time to it.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
_______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
