Count me in. wolfy On June 30, 2020 9:20:55 PM GMT+03:00, Rich Bowen <rbowen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi, folks, > >I've been working through the CentOS wiki for more than a year now, >trying to identify and fix outdated/wrong/obsolete content. It's a >daunting task, and I'm losing. > >I would very much like to gather a group of people who are: > >* Knowledgeable about CentOS >* Good with words >* Have a little time > >who would be willing and able to review the content of the wiki, and >fix >the bits that are incorrect. > >The CentOS Documentation SIG (which doesn't actually exist in any >meaningful way) is, according to the wiki: > >responsible for the content of the Wiki, and other public sources of >documentation. This includes, but is not limited to: > >* Determining, and imposing, a hierarchy/architecture of content in the >wiki >* Editing/pruning existing content when it is >incorrect/outdated/obsolete >* Recruiting subject matter experts to do some of that editing >* Recruiting translators to keep our various translations in sync > >[Ref: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation ] > >If any of the above appeals to you, I would ask you to let me know. I >would like to create a SIG around the wiki. Please let me know if >you're >interested. I know that there are a number of you who are consistently >active on this list. I would like to find a way to give us a little >more >power/authority over the wiki to make higher-level editorial decisions >about information architecture. Also, having a formal SIG might be a >way >to engage more people to join the effort and dedicate some time to it. > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS-docs mailing list >CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
