On 20/06/16 14:13, Mohammed Ahmed wrote: > I think that should be for the container pipeline itself, not atomic > registry. Correct me if I am wrong. > Also, I should probably consider requesting write access to the > container pipeline page as well at > some point. yes, I agree. The Atomic registry has nothing to do with the container pipeline, so the two should not be confused into the same namespace. we should document howto use the registry in the same way as we do howto's for apps etc. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
