You should now be able to edit that /Books page with your wiki username PacktPublishing. Cheers, On 19/05/16 06:13, Partners wrote: > Hi Fabian, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Could you please direct me to the person who could give me the rights to > add our books? > > Looking forward to hearing from you. > > Thanks & Regards > Sherwin > > *Sherwin Silveira* > *Key Partner Executive* > <https://www.packtpub.com/> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *centos-docs-request@xxxxxxxxxx > *To: *centos-docs@xxxxxxxxxx > *Sent: *Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:30:01 PM > *Subject: *CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 114, Issue 3 > > Send CentOS-docs mailing list submissions to > centos-docs@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-docs-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > centos-docs-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CentOS-docs digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: discussions around upstream documentation (Jim Perrin) > 2. Re: Request to contribute to wiki page (CentOS) (Fabian Arrotin) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 07:09:58 -0500 > From: Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: centos-docs@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: discussions around upstream documentation > Message-ID: <573B0A16.3050709@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > The Fedora team is working on moving away from docbook and xml to > asciidoc. This is a more straightforward approach in the file, with a > reasonably easy syntax to learn. This will let us keep docs in git so > that users who find something and want to fix it can simply submit a > pull request or patch to update and someone responsible can approve or > deny it. > > In the future, it means that non-wiki docs should be easily consumable > and editable. That doesn't help us for the current state of > documentation, but it does help to resolve things for the future. I'm > still working on the state of the existing docs via a few contacts I > made at the docs day. > > On 05/17/2016 04:07 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: >> Jim, >> >> What were the outcomes from a CentOS perspective? >> >> thank you. >> >> regards, >> >> bex >> >> On 04/11/2016 06:18 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >>> There is a Fedora Activity Day >>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Documentation_2016 ) centered around >>> documentation, where I'm going to see what can be done about the state >>> of centos documentation from upstream sources. >>> >>> Most of the tooling for documentation for these two groups is centered >>> around git. For the most part, our documentation currently lives in the >>> wiki, and has a fairly high barrier to new contributors. >>> >>> Would the regulars who contribute on the wiki consider consider >>> supporting a migration to a git based documentation workflow? >>> >>> I think this would help lower the barrier to contribution by allowing >>> new contributors to submit a pull request or patch for documentation >>> rather than join a mailing list, request access, etc. >>> >>> What are the thoughts or concerns about this sort of workflow change? >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 18:51:02 +0200 > From: Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: centos-docs@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Request to contribute to wiki page (CentOS) > Message-ID: <573B4BF6.8040403@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > On 12/05/16 10:00, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 12/05/16 06:12, Partners wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have received the subscription notification. >>> Following is the information required to contribute to the wiki page: >>> >>> Username: PacktPublishing >>> Subject: Book feature on the wiki page >>> Location: https://wiki.centos.org/Books >>> >>> Thanks & Regards >>> Sherwin >>> >>> *Sherwin Silveira* >>> *Key Partner Executive* >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/> >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> Maybe I'm getting this wrong, but the goal of a wiki is to centralize >> docs/howtos/tips-n-tricks on the wiki, and not promoting books ? Or are >> those books under CC-by-SA license and so fully/freely available > somewhere ? >> > > Just reading that again and it seems that /Books already has links to > other books, so I guess that the centos-docs team is ok with that. > If so, someone can probably give you rights to add your books there. > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 198 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: > <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20160517/ab2c0ca3/attachment-0001.sig> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > > > End of CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 114, Issue 3 > ******************************************* > -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs