Re: rpmforge references in the wiki

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Burn the references with fire. 

If there are any references to litko then they should be treated equally. Both are dead. 

On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Christoph Galuschka <tigalch@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everyone,

Am 13.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb John R. Dennison:
Someone made mention on IRC earlier of a reference to rpmforge on the
wiki and it got me thinking (yeah, never a good thing)...

A quick search on the wiki itself shows a lot_of references to
rpmforge.  As this is a dead project and has been a dead project for 3+
years now it would be quite useful to the consumers of the wiki material
for those references to be removed and replaced with something that is
trusted, epel for example.

I mentioned it to Christoph Galuschka and it was decided to bring this
matter up here.

As allready mentioned +1 from in replacing where possible and removing where not.

Again, rpmforge is a dead project and any hope of it coming back is just
a pipedream.  References to it as a resource are a disservice to wiki
users.





                                                        John



_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

all the best
Christoph
--
Christoph Galuschka
CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux