If there are any references to litko then they should be treated equally. Both are dead.
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Christoph Galuschka <tigalch@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Christoph Galuschka <tigalch@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Am 13.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb John R. Dennison:
Someone made mention on IRC earlier of a reference to rpmforge on the
wiki and it got me thinking (yeah, never a good thing)...
A quick search on the wiki itself shows a lot_of references to
rpmforge. As this is a dead project and has been a dead project for 3+
years now it would be quite useful to the consumers of the wiki material
for those references to be removed and replaced with something that is
trusted, epel for example.
I mentioned it to Christoph Galuschka and it was decided to bring this
matter up here.
As allready mentioned +1 from in replacing where possible and removing where not.
all the best
Again, rpmforge is a dead project and any hope of it coming back is just
a pipedream. References to it as a resource are a disservice to wiki
users.
John
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Christoph
--
Christoph Galuschka
CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
_______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
