On 22/03/16 10:21, François Cami wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant > <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for >>> point #3 (Manuals and other documentation) >>> As we have no real content for CentOS 6 and 7 , my idea was just to >>> explain in one line that (while technically not the CentOS >>> documentation) , almost all the points coming from uptream documentation >>> ( - except for subscription manager - ) can be applied to CentOS and so >>> having link from that section to >>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/ >>> >>> Ideas, thoughts, comments ? >>> >> +1 for that. it's long overdue. > > -1 from me, because access.redhat.com documentation contains support > statements which are irrelevant to the CentOS project. I'd very much > like to avoid generating (more) confusion in potential users. > > François Yes, but I was mentioning documentation about how to deploy/configure/maintain it, but you have a point : so the note would need to mention that everything regarding support channels and subscriptions should be considered "not applicable" to CentOS It's true that it can confuse potential users, but not having documentation at all doesn't help, and from what I see in #centos or forums, people are already pointed to the only existing doc, aka the upstream ones -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
