KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no indication that they're really really bad. As well as the recognition of the reality that there are a very few repos that are frequently recommended (and, in the case of EPEL, now easily enabled in CentOS).
I don't believe I discussed it on this list, which is entirely my fault, but there were some revisions afterwards by others in the community to help do cleanup as well.On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
> Could someone please replace the contents of
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
> with the contents of
> http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ?
>
I dont understand the concept of community approved. What does that mean ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
_______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
