Hi, Am 09.12.2014 um 22:22 schrieb Alan Bartlett: > As far as I can see, you should now be able to edit that page. Given all of this trouble: Do you really think that your "policy" to get write access is appropriate? I don't want to complain too much here, but I think that the entry barrier of a wiki should be as low as possible in order for people to participate. I understand your need to take measures against spam bots and random changes by non-technical beginners. I guess its a fair assumption that people contributing to the CentOS wiki are more technical than the general public, but nonetheless I think requesting write access via a mailing list, the necessity for a particular naming scheme and maintaining a whole bunch of ACLs on your end is massive overkill. Were there any (bad) issues in the past, which made all of this necessary? Otherwise I would strongly argue for loosening all of this up, just to give more people the possibility to participate. Please don't get me wrong: I'm not trolling, this is just a suggestion. I'm perfectly fine with the status quo, I'm just not sure what you want to achieve and you might be overreaching. Anyway, you are doing a superb job. The turn-around time for my requests was really good. But by loosening up this process, you would relieve yourself from this "trivial" tasks. Best regards, Karol Babioch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
