-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> snip
>
> What's all this about SIGs, contributors, and committers? The CentOS
> Wiki didn't use to work that way.
This is part of a piece I sent this to Karsten earlier today:
> Karsten:
>
> Speaking of which, do we have any writing standards for
> using the wiki? Anything to point new contributors to?
Historically, to get rights on the CentOS wiki, one had to
have a:
- have subscribed to the -docs ML
- registered with CamelCase wikiname
- optionally set up a homepage
(doing so required asking for limited rights
to do so in that sub-space on the -docs ML)
- discuss on the -docs ML, the intended content,
optionally putting a preview below the
personal homepage in the hierarchy
- one point being it was not interesting to simply
parrot RH doco, or replicate content elsewhere,
but rather to document deviations between CentOS
and RHEL
as there were some deviation by design or by necessity:
updater driven -- early days yum not RHN, artwork, license
matters
------ extract ends ------
- -- Russ herrold
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlLhgTUACgkQMRh1QZtklkQWZgCfThzmJazc5+Wf37EBlefdxMUM
rNYAoIRPeIR1zXoOuBH+ilCCrCZ2f4Yu
=HDpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
