On 28.10.2012 09:52, Harald Oehlmann wrote: > Am 27.10.2012 23:33, schrieb Ralph Angenendt: > 1) I would put the test chapter after the SELinux chapter Okay. > 2) The first sentence in 5.1 suggestes (for me), that the settings for > CentOS 5 are not required for CentOS 6. I don't think this is the case. > > Proposed change: > Current phrase: "For CentOS 6 a slightly different approach is needed." > New phrase: "For CentOS 6, additional steps are required." Changed that. > 3) Are you shure, this is CentOS 6 specific ? How do you know ? I tested this on CentOS 5 way back when that content was written. :) > 4) I personally would add some explanation in 5.1, what this is for. > The reason for explanation is, that this scheme may be used for eventual > other virus scanners in an analoguous way. Added that, too. > 5) I am not shure, if the "Harald Oehlmann" and the link to the post is > very helpful... I just wanted to give credit, where credit is due :) Plus: Your mail has some reasoning as to why that was added, which I don't know if that should belong on that page. I can take that out, if you want. Regards, Ralph _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
