Yves Bellefeuille wrote on 05/11/2012 11:18 PM: > At number 14, the example partition should be /dev/sda1, not /dev/sda2, > and "whatever device corresponds to the second USB partition" should be > "the first USB partition". I got confused between the installation boot and the ISO image devices. > In fact, I think that the USB key will probably be /dev/sdb, not > /dev/sda, but you do specify that the user should choose the first > partition on the USB key, so the user can decide what's appropriate. I know in at least some of my tests it was /dev/sda but probably depends on the BIOS - need to test again with the updates. > At number 15, I think I made a mistake. The BIOS*may* think that the > USB key is the first drive, but not necessarily. I think that this > depends on whether the user uses Grub or not. In any event, I suggest > "the BIOS may think that the USB key is the first drive", and "the user > may have to change the order of the hard drives". > > As I said, this is my mistake. Sorry I tried to clarify. See how it reads now. > At number 16, the example drive for the "mount" command should be the > same as the one mentioned at number 14, so if number 14 refers to > /dev/sda1, then number 16 should say "mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 > /mnt/isodir" (rather then /dev/sdb2). I should have caught that. Anybody know where to find the bug mentioned in #7? I can't seem to turn it up. Maybe after another cup of coffee. :-) Thanks again, Phil _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
