On 04/21/2012 06:39 PM, Paul R. (Crunch) wrote: > On 04/21/2012 12:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 04/20/2012 10:24 PM, Crunch wrote: >>> I thought that might be. Thanks for clearing that up. The other >>> possibility was that a "new" license included some extra constraints >>> but >>> I wasn't to sure if that was allowed. Instead of trying to find the >>> answer in the license itself, I thought it would be simpler to ask, and >>> it was. >> the biggest constrain from our perspective is that those docs are for >> RHEL not CentOS. And we dont want the messaging to be 'CentOS is RHEL, >> but free'. As Ed pointed out somethings are different in the way we do >> mirrors and installer etc, support options are different and the way >> some of the code works in the distro is different as well. So while its >> ok to say that CentOS should work like whats in the doc, we need enough >> adaption to make it clear were not saying CentOS == RHEL. > > Okay. It may be easiest then just to knock something off and see if it > is agreeable. The question is how much different is different enough. > I'm guessing this has been covered before. In any case the current > docs can be used as a point of departure. > > I do have something I would like you to look at, but I'm not sure > sending it to the list is a good idea. The file is 2MB odd. You can > download it here: http://www.4shared.com/folder/trOCQ_x3/shared.html > > Once you've decompressed the archive, point your browser at: > > docs.redhat.com.adapted/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/6.0_Release_Notes/index.html > > > You can run the following command on this file to get an idea of the > context in which the word CentOS is used and where it replaced the old > name: > > egrep -oi 'centos.{0,40}' index.html > > There are some cases where 'CentOS' and the surrounding text should be > removed such as when support is mentioned. > > ... I do apologize but something occurred to me and I have deleted the file from the share. The document breaks the license agreement in its current form so distributing it is probably not a good idea. What should we do? Send it to one person? I think I'll fix the bits that aren't right and put it back later. Will let you know. _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
