On 04/20/2012 06:44 PM, Crunch wrote: > 1) Why if the original document was licensed with an "open commons" > license is the document being relicensed as an "open publication" license. they were not open commons originally, and i guess we just need to update things at our end to get in line ( and update the docs as well ) > 2) Why does the foot note say that you can't modify the document? "open > commons" states that you can do anything you like to the document so > long as it retains a reference to the original document and licensor. same as above.. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
