On 04/06/2012 08:08 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/06/2012 09:04 PM, Crunch wrote: >> For starters, I propose replacing all occurrences of upstream's name and >> replace all the upstream logos with CentOS ones. Somewhere near the end >> of the document include the link to the original document. > Do we need to do that ? Can we reduce the work a bit by saying : > "Here are the upstream docs, we build from the same sources and aim to > deliver the same functionality so things should apply the same to our > linux distro as well?'. And add a note to this effect on the bottom of > every page ( and maybe put in the CentOS Blue banner to the top ). It could be a nice touch. Once it's done, the whole lot could act as a sort of template for future alterations so it wouldn't be as much effort. We can give it a go with one and if it turns out to be a schlep, we leave it. > >> I think leave the ssh for now, I don't see the need. At most an ftp >> account with apache pointing at the directory, so that people can get to >> files easy enough. If it's good with you. > fair enough, lets get something up once there is something to look at. > > I'll send you the file(s). _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
