On 07/09/2011 04:13 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> It is my impression that we could and should 'adapt' the documentation >> by removing the upstream provider logos and other marks (as applicable) >> and mark the documentation as CentOS documentation. Obviously, >> including references to the original document. This would give the >> CentOS project the ability to edit out the aspects that are specific to >> the upstream product, such as the contract number during install. > > ok, submit a patch / script to do that :-) > depending on how much of it can be automated, that would be idea - otherwise we can import the stuff into a git repo and use that as a base to work from. - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
