Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Am 02.04.11 15:15, schrieb Milos Blazevic: > > >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2387594 >> >> Having said that, I would really appreciate if you could review the >> article, got back to me with your findings, and if the content from this >> source could find it's way into this fine Wiki article of yours :) >> > > Does the license of that article allow that (I guess it could be > rewritten)? :) > > I don't have a problem with the content (as dkms is available from > trusted repositories), so I'd have no problem with the inclusion either. > But yeah, maybe the main author of the article wants to chime in. > > Ralph > _______________________________________________ > Damn, you're 100% right, Ralph... This definitely is something that should be taken into consideration. I really wouldn't like for this suggestion to cause any trouble to either CentOS Wiki or to Ozy... However, I sadly have to admitt my knowledge is rather poor on this matter. Hence, I'm hoping for someone with more experience in this legal stuff to chime in. (But then again, I really don't see the reason why would the "Redmond heretics" mind - maybe not if the original article is pointed out as a reference and source for some part of the CentOS Wiki article?) Regards, -- ***Milos Blazevic* RHCE Cert. No: 805010564450148
