On 05/21/2010 04:46 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote: > So, assuming you have overruled both Johnny and Russ, will you please > make "the one being used in CentOS" known to the rest of the world. Think about it for a second, you don't feel that process's are changable ? Would you like to point me to where it says that what we were doing at one stage will never ever change ? I havent overruled anyone there, just pointed out that content on there no longer reflects the process - however, the gist of the article is still correct. > I trust your wording above, and hence the implicit message, was an > error. I was lead to believe, after the Lance Davis affair of last > summer, that there would be no more secrecy or any unilateral > decisions made by one person. Given that you are not a part of the team that handles buildsystem issues, what made you think that any of these process's were down to only one person ? - KB
