Hi again, > It is perfectly reasonable that I argue to strive to make > fewer forks and less content in the CentOS wiki under that > rubric, as success means the future's primary source doco is > better for _all_ FOSS approaches I think it's not that easy to handle. Let's take a look at another example: amavisd-new The original author of the application does not offer a platform for docs. There is a very good how to available on our wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd explaining how to deal with this program. It covers a lot of configuration aspects that are not CentOS specific. Should this one be removed from the wiki, even if it helps a lot of ppl out there configuring the related components correctly? As mentioned before: > Besides that I think that docs that are not available somewhere else > in any form could as well be published on the CentOS wiki. This would > even make more sense if they are centos-specific. Best Regards Marcus
