From: "Manuel Wolfshant", Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:39 PM > On 09/03/2009 07:02 PM, Ed Heron wrote: >> Are there any other opinions? Questions? >> >> Is my suggestion to add ./vhost.d/ to the Apache configuration as a >> user >> installable option not acceptable? > From a technical point of view, your suggestion seems 100% correct, > including the selinux context needed for the new directory [*]. However > I still think that it simply duplicates the existing functionality of > the conf.d folder (which, in my opinion, exists with the very purpose of > adding new configuration files -- including the definition of virtual > hosts) and therefore it is useless. I added some information to describe my position. I have no problem if you want to add a section describing your point of view. If nothing else, we are providing information to users. > On the other hand, I do like your proposal from > http://wiki.centos.org/EdHeron/ApacheVhostDefault (minus the first > subparagraph of paragraph #5, of course). Thanks! > [1] I am not sure what will happen after a full relabeling of the > system, since the new directory does not exist in the selinux database > (I mean /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts, part of > selinux-policy) I added a disclaimer. Does it cover it?
