On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:24:28PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > With a big fat warning sign? Have you already tested things in there? There are a number of #centos regulars that are using the IUS packages and I've yet to hear of any complaints with them. Just an additional datapoint. John -- DMR: So fsck was originally called something else. Q: What was it called? DMR: Well, the second letter was different. -- Dennis M. Ritchie, Usenix, June 18, 1998. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20091125/ffc739a7/attachment.bin
