On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 03:51, Alan Bartlett <ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 16/05/2009, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote: Ok, lets summarize it: Against: There is no hierarchy where www is the "top", the www site is appalling, www isn't updated. For: www has links to wiki, website, forums, mirrors, projects, bug. And do I hear a split between the maintainers of www and wiki ? That's unfortunate because that bad for CentOS branding and trust. I dont see www and the wiki or the forum a it's own entity, its a part of http://centos.org/ !?!? And if the http://centos.org/ is crap shouldn't it be addressed and discussed in a proper topic so it can be redesigned ? And I agree the http://centos.org/ is looking like a pole with adds on it. So my question is it a hierarchy with http://centos.org/ on the top and bugs and wiki as subs to it ? Answer: Yes / No /Mats
