Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/07/2009 07:11 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >> I guess the URLs could be: > >> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/php516to526devupgrade > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PHP_5.1_To_5.2 > > would this not be very centos-5 specific ? would we / should we have > some namespace in the url to indicate that ? The article itself should state that it is for 5 only. I'm against overly complicating namespace - what happens if an article is for 3, 4 and 5, an addendum to that article only for 3 and 4? And 5 would need a different treatment? Would we then create *and maintain* that article several times, for each Release? And what happens, when 6 comes out and the same is vailid for 6? In case 1 I'd just write "this also applies to 6" - in case two I'd need to mangle the namespace. > also - this page would need to be changed once the pkgs from move > testing to plus/appstack Sure, I hope that Eric will stay on and add these changes :) Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090708/6453fd9f/attachment.bin
