I thought better to send these links prior to paste into the wiki, as I noticed before about the upstream vendor vs. CentOS "correlation". On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:20 AM, R P Herrold <herrold at centos.org> wrote: > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, R P Herrold wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Vitor Afonso Strabello wrote: > >> > >>> Can I post a link to the "prominent North American > >>> Enterprise Linux vendor" about it also? > >> > >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0397.html > >> > >> Counsel for the PNAELV expressly asked that CentOS NOT 'deep > >> link' into their site. > > > > Do we have the complete text available ? > > yes -- I see no reason to re-debate their position here, as it > simply picks open old wounds to no good end, and have provided > a link to you privately. > > -- Russ herrold > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > -- Int? msn: vstrabello at hotmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090104/80ba49ca/attachment.html
