On 03/02/2009, S.Tindall <tindall.satwth at brandxmail.com> wrote: > > There was an interesting note in a recent fedoraproject.org newsletter > regarding Redhat's legal views on referring to others' trademarks. Since > the comments are lengthy, they are not reproduced here and are available > at the links below. > > FWN/Issue161: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue161#Legal > > Callaway note: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-January/msg00012.html > > Fedora Packaging Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description > > Although they are really talking about non-Redhat trademarks, the points > are equally applicable to the Redhat trademarks and related issues as > might (or might not) be used in CentOS documentation. > > Those comments make interesting food-for-thought with regard to the off > and on discussions on how to or how not to (or how if-at-all to) refer > to Redhat in CentOS documentation. Steve, The first thing to get right is the name of the upstream company. It is (and here I am quoting from upstream themselves) "Red Hat". Two three letter words, the first letter of each in upper case. Alan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090203/770ec3de/attachment.html
