On 04/30/2009 12:49 PM, R P Herrold wrote: >> easy. It lends credibility to the idea that CentOS is more than a >> knock-off RHEL. >> > > I have no such goal to court public opinion, and I think > neither does the core value of the project; that people feel > a need to use CentOS as a locus to contribute is a matter > beyond the core scope mandate of a strict rebuild project > I think the core name may disagree :-P : *CentOS : Community ENTerprise Operating System * Would have to change to: *CSMoaSRP : **Core Scope Mandate of a Strict Rebuild Project* "centos" seems to roll from the tongue a bit easier :-D Honestly, I know this thread started as simple request and has changed in size and scope (to say the least). There are sure a lot different ways to handle a simple concept. Maybe there can be room for all of these proposed options as sections. They are all valid IMHO. Some can argue that there is a "good -> better -> best" order and that is OK with me. Heck, I have even learned a new way to handle my own duplicate non-RAID /boot(s) thanks to Russ! pjwelsh
