proposed changes option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phil Schaffner wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 21:31 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> ...
>> I've been rather busy of late so haven't been following the full details 
>> of this discussion (just briefly reading), but the moment you're ready 
>> for us to jump in with some testing, please give us a loud shout and 
>> we'll be there :)
> 
> Same here.  Also sounds like there is likely to be a need to recruit
> Wiki moderators.  That might be done through the forums as well as this
> list.
> 
> I'd like to weigh in on the side of a more open Wiki with fewer barriers
> to contributing and/or editing.

That would be great! I'm sure many users wanted to contribute something 
(not viagra links) at some point, but found the whole process 
discouraging. I did.
If MoinMoin can do some captcha and export as rss the new pages/edits I 
don't think it's going to be a problem to have them checked out.

Been also checking the website "unification" progress... It's not going 
well. I guess starting from scratch is out of the question?

Regards,

Lucian

> That is admittedly opening up the doors
> to more spammers or other malicious content-providers; however a robust
> moderator staff should help to mitigate that nastiness.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux