Phil Schaffner wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 21:31 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: > ... >> I've been rather busy of late so haven't been following the full details >> of this discussion (just briefly reading), but the moment you're ready >> for us to jump in with some testing, please give us a loud shout and >> we'll be there :) > > Same here. Also sounds like there is likely to be a need to recruit > Wiki moderators. That might be done through the forums as well as this > list. > > I'd like to weigh in on the side of a more open Wiki with fewer barriers > to contributing and/or editing. That would be great! I'm sure many users wanted to contribute something (not viagra links) at some point, but found the whole process discouraging. I did. If MoinMoin can do some captcha and export as rss the new pages/edits I don't think it's going to be a problem to have them checked out. Been also checking the website "unification" progress... It's not going well. I guess starting from scratch is out of the question? Regards, Lucian > That is admittedly opening up the doors > to more spammers or other malicious content-providers; however a robust > moderator staff should help to mitigate that nastiness. > > Phil > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
