On 25/09/2008, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos@xxxxxxxxxxxx<ra%2Bcentos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Alan Bartlett wrote: > > On 24/09/2008, Ralph Angenendt > > > <ra+centos@xxxxxxxxxxxx <ra%2Bcentos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>< > ra%2Bcentos@xxxxxxxxxxxx <ra%252Bcentos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>> > > > wrote: > > > > I would like to request a mailinglist for the ArtworkSig, where we > > > > could discuss Artwork related stuff. This would be much better than > > > > 'flooding' the -docs. > > > > > > I think we should do that (especially as Artwork discussions are now > shared > > > between docs and devel ...).++ > > So that was a +1? >:D Indeed it was. After 25 years of writing C code, it's almost a reflex action to post-increment, rather than +1 something. Apologies if it wasn't obvious. In English - Although artwork discussions are interesting to me, due to the current quantity that is now appearing on both of the afore mentioned m/ls Marcus' suggestion would be a good idea. Alan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20080925/207f0129/attachment.htm
