Karanbir Singh wrote: > The problem here is that the testing repo should *not* be mentioned in > the wiki pages at all. I would even venture out to say a search / purge > should be carried out to remove that. > > I do plan on doing a rm -rf in the testing repo in the next few weeks, > so most of that content in the wiki would be redundant anyway if it > refers to specifics from the testing repo. > > Ralph, is that ok with you ? We have content in there which needs to go somewhere else before that (like the directory server or openjdk-1.6). Tim: Have you finished moving^W^W^Wany idea where one could put that? Otherwise I'm behind that idea. *Or* we need to redefine the testing.repo. > Suggestions / recommendations are welcome, as always. Eg. what might be > a better way to get some exposure to the testing repo in the wiki > without putting it in front of users-at-large. I don't really think you can. Either we need to test stuff within qa, which will not work because of the varietey of stuff in testing (there are packages in testing I cannot even remotely test because I haven't the faintest idea what they are), or we need to set up "personal" repos for testing, for example a centos-dirserv.repo, so that people who are interested can test stuff like that *before* it goes into centosplus/extras. But you need large exposure (possibly from within the community of a certain application) for testing packages. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20080916/cdd7b6f7/attachment.bin
